This past Tuesday the Buffalo Common Council once again
opened the floor to the ongoing Food Truck debate and 45 minutes later, the
sides were no closer to a badly needed resolution. The council apparently
wanted no part of making the hard decisions or helping to bridge the gap for
the two groups when they tabled the debate for at least another month. In
September the council heard both sides of the argument and ended that public
hearing by creating a special panel consisting of 3 people representing the
newly formed Food Truck Association and 3 from the side representing the Brick
and Mortar restaurants opposed to the potentially free roaming trucks. They
were given 30 days to try to reach a middle ground and draft fair legislation
that the council could vote on. Needless to say the food trucks would love
clarification on where they can and cannot go. The current cautiously
restrictive atmosphere with no rules favors the brick and mortars although the
fact that they have made such a stink about the trucks shows they are afraid of
them and want to nip them before they are numerous and widespread over the
area. The council hoped the two sides could come up with something they could
simply vote on and sign but I think everyone but the council knew it was not
going to be that easy.
The council tried to pass the responsibility to the parties
involved to find the answer instead of coming up with one themselves and this
has only delayed the process which hurts the food truck side more than the
B&Ms. The increasing passion displayed by both parties is making it very
difficult for the two sides to work together and compromise their way to fair
legislation and recent events suggest it would seem one side is a little more
interested in finding that resolution than the other. The food trucks have been
on record since day one asking for fair legislation so that they and the brick
and mortars could finally know what the rules are and conduct business
accordingly. This process began months ago as the elder statesmen of the
Buffalo food truck scene, Lloyd Taco Trucks (who have been in service well over
a year now) worked last April to draft legislation with North district council
member Joseph Golombek that has
basically been forgotten at this point. What do brick and mortars really have
to gain by coming to the table and working this thing out? They like how things
are now whereby the trucks are limited and cannot move around freely. They want
the food trucks on short leashes. The B&Ms have no incentive to want fair
legislation. This idea of a panel was doomed from the start and seems like the
council’s way of avoiding doing the work and making the tough decisions they
would have to make to get this done. So when I heard that the two parties could
not reach an agreement after the 30 days I was not surprised.
This is how it works: When the food truck side brings over
any ideas the other side screams about how it’s not fair and holds it up
without offering any ideas of their own and if by chance they do, they’ll be
unreasonable ideas at best, again wasting everyone’s time and insuring nothing
will get done making this dynamic eerily similar to the dynamic going on in
Washington and in cities all over the country right now. One side wants it fair
for all and the other side doesn’t want to give an inch or let anybody join
their club. To me this food truck squabble reflects the growing fights in this
country between the rich and poor, democrats and republicans and the occupiers
camped out in every major city. One group wants to work to fix a problem and
the other group won’t take their calls.
Reports indicate that the good faith discussions went south
just days before the Council’s mandated 30 day period were up and broke down into
a yelling match between the two sides. All over the country battles are being
waged by protectionist factions seeking the status quo and these upstart mobile
vendors who just want a fair chance to compete in the marketplace. In some
cities great strides are being made and happy consumers are reaping the
delicious results while in other places food trucks are forced into being rogue
outlaw type vendors despite the public love and demand for them.
It’s well documented all over this country, people WANT food
trucks. The food is often times cheaper, fresher, healthier and arguably
tastier than their B&M counterparts. Businesses like brick and mortar
restaurants who pay large chunks in property taxes and who are subject to fees
and regulations they claim the food trucks do not, have the ears of their local
politicians. Money talks. But do the food trucks have an unfair advantage over
the brick and mortar restaurants? Just because they both serve food, that
doesn’t make them easy to compare. In fact, some would tell you that comparing
the two is akin to comparing apples and oranges, that is, related but not the
same.
Food trucks are mobile and this means they can tap into
customer bases all over an area, at least in theory. As for now in Buffalo, the trucks can
only appear on private property by invitation or in a designated public
location if they obtain the proper permit. Lloyd has maintained a regular home
at Main and Mohawk through the use of such a
permit. Most of the major pedestrian areas of Buffalo have been closed to the trucks. Any
attempt to vend in one of them results in someone calling the police,
complaining and asking for action. This happens despite the fact the trucks are
not breaking any laws (none exist), they get asked to leave which in the few
instances when it has happened, the trucks have complied, again despite not
doing anything technically wrong.
Brick and mortars talk about how the food trucks have an
unfair advantage. I just don’t see it, especially as the weather turns for the
next 5-6 months. Even today on my way in I saw the Whole Hog at Millard
Fillmore hospital and there were no lines. People don’t want to stand in the
cold for a sizable amount of time with no warm place to sit and eat unless they
are lucky enough to work or live next to where the truck is located that day
and even then it’s still a matter of wanting to brave the elements to wait for
the food. That’s certainly going to discourage a fair amount of people from
patronizing the trucks in the winter. These trucks have service windows but not
a drive thru one. As a reaction to this, some trucks are informing customers
they can call ahead and order but that is still thought of as more work than going
through a drive-thru, stopping somewhere warm for fast food or even having
lunch delivered. When it gets cold, I say advantage restaurants with their warm
seating, restrooms and ability to offer customers more than just a nice meal.
It’s more than a seasonal disadvantage. Since the trucks
move around often and use social media and websites to update their status
sometimes with only a few hours notice, many people don’t even know when a
truck is in the neighborhood or at or near their workplace. Plus there are
others who simply can’t get there. Take me for instance as someone who often
bikes to work. It’s not easy to go half way across town on a 30 or even 60
minute lunch break to get food. People like me will often frequent places close
by due to time and travel restraints. If a truck happens to be close by, that’s
great, I have another choice but I can count the number of times a food truck
has been near my work on one hand. Yes they can offer fresher, cheaper,
healthier and possibly even better tasting options than many restaurants but
should that make them that serious a threat? Some people want food truck food
for the taste, the cost or the novelty but many people still want to sit and
dine and enjoy the comforts of a restaurant. There is room for both, especially
in places like Buffalo where any trip out to people watch will quickly and easily
demonstrate how much we love to eat.
This “fight” shouldn’t even be happening. How is this really
different from what goes on in America
daily? It’s called competition. We see it all the time. Starbucks had no
problem moving 2 buildings down from Caffe Aroma on Elmwood several years ago.
Where was the proximity rule then? Where was the group of local businesspeople
fighting for a local businesses’ right to exist without potential corporate
domination? When Jim’s Steakout started serving tacos, where was all the public
distain from Elmwood Taco and Sub? I mean, they are right across the street
from each other. How could they do such a thing? These B&Ms would have you
believe that these trucks are so dangerous to the local economy because they’ll
close restaurants. They’ll try to make people afraid of them because they are easy
to run and operate and they’ll overrun us all! If they are so easy to start, why doesn’t
every one of these restaurants have a truck of their own already or one on the
way? It’s because these trucks are not easy to run or operate. Many of these
brash entrepreneurs have gambled a great deal on these trucks. Some have
returned home after decades away to pursue a dream. Others have gone out on
their own to start their first business. They should not be denied the right to
do so because the people who already have seats at the table don’t want any
company. This is America
where people can start businesses and chase dreams, where competition is king
and choice is the consumer’s right.
Restaurants open right next to other restaurants all the
time. It’s a fact of life. To this day the intersection of Delaware
and Sheridan
features a McDonald’s and a Burger King kitty corner from one another and has
for over a decade. Would one prefer that the other wasn’t there, of course but
competition and innovation are two cornerstones of the business world. So
there’s a new kid in town with better food and prices… tough, suck it up. Do
what you did when your nearest competitor opened down or across the street from
you. Make your product better, advertise well and win people back with your
product and service. This is just one man’s opinion but if ETS or Jim’s had a
better burrito or taco than Lloyd Taco Trucks, I would have continued to eat
there, however they don’t, it’s not close and I think Lloyd has one of the best
burritos in the city, if not the best. I think The Roaming Buffalo has one of
the best burgers. I also love the pulled pork, greens and sides at The Whole
Hog and R & R BBQ. I go to them because
they are better. To use a bit of street slang, I find this whole situation
to be player-hating of the highest order. To date, no restaurant has gone out
of business because of a food truck but maybe some of them should if they can’t
step up their game and keep up with the times. Why can’t any brick and mortar
get a food truck of their own? I heard a rumor that The Place on Lexington is doing just
that. Good for them. It will expand their business and customer base and they
can reach out to people who never heard of them or knew of their whereabouts.
It’s smart business.
The restaurants know that winter is the toughest time of the
year for the food trucks, especially in colder climates like this one. This
long cold winter with no legislation could potentially cost the Buffalo area a few trucks
and possibly more of the aspiring ones who sit on the sidelines waiting to see
what the council will do before they dive completely in. With the economy how
it is and how it has been in this area for decades, the high taxes, the
abnormally high gas prices and living in an economically recessed area like
this one which some might say is about 50 years past it’s prime, you would
think lawmakers would want to encourage new business and actually I dunno, do
their job and make laws that help to raise this area back up again.
As a lifelong Buffaloian I can tell you my love for this
city runs deep and despite the lack of jobs and opportunities, I still think of
Buffalo as a
great place to live. A big part of the reason I do is the quality of life here.
For most of us the quality of life is largely broken down into nature, sports and
then arts and culture. Right now the sports are doing fine and we’re all better
for it… anyone who thinks otherwise need only to check the office mood the morning
after a Bills game. But the other side of it, the arts and culture side has
been under siege by a hopefully soon to be leaving county executive who doesn’t
think arts and culture funding is fiscally responsible and a common council
afraid to act and give the people what they want.
At this week’s hearing The Director of Activism and
Coalitions for the nationally known Institute for Justice, Christina Walsh flew
up here on her own dime to talk to the council about the importance of passing
legislation for the trucks and making Buffalo
a trendsetter at the lead of the movement. She also set the record straight
discussing the misconceptions about food trucks and backed it up with numbers
and facts. From what I understand she dazzled those in attendance with facts
and logic. I guess that kind of language scared and/or confused the council. At
the September public hearing the Food Truck Association presented the council
with a petition that had over 5,000 signatures collected in mere days in
support of the food trucks. Such passionate support for such a new enterprise
can only attest to the growing and continued popularity of these trucks. It’s
time to put up or shut up Buffalo.
We want them, give them to us!
Put something together and TRY it. Find out what works and
what doesn’t. Draft some short term legislation and let’s find out what’s fair
and what isn’t. Let’s see what happens and then we can tweak it to make it
better but DO something! The food trucks have been fighting the bureaucracy of
the politicians and the stall tactics of the brick and mortars for over a year
now with no end in sight. They have petitions, online fans in the thousands and
even national advocates for freedom speaking on their behalf. What they don’t
have is legislation. This is a critical point in the process. Some of the
trucks may not make it through the winter or be forced to relocate to a city
more inviting than Buffalo
has been so far. Imagine that… a Buffalo rooted food truck thriving in another
city because Buffalo
didn’t want them! It’s time for the common council to sit down with both sides
and get this thing done. The people want long overdue action. Forgive me if I’m
not too confident in the council to act but this week’s inaction by putting the
issue aside only strengthens the long standing cynical belief among many
citizens that City Hall is the place where good ideas go to die. Let’s change
that long standing cynicism and transform City Hall from graveyard to the
institution we all hoped it could be. Buffalo Common Council the ball is your
court. The people have spoken. Get it done!